You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Profissional da saúde frente a situação de ter um familiar em cuidados paliativos por câncer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.01.55080 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aline Blaas Schiavon, Rosani Manfrin Muniz, Norlai Alves de Azevedo, Daniela Habekost Cardoso, Michele Rodrigues Matos, Isabel Cristina Oliveira Arrieira |
| Abstract |
Objective To know the experience of health workers who are coping with having a relative in palliative care for cancer. Methodology A qualitative study conducted with four family members of cancer patients in palliative care. Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews from November to December, 2014, at the home of the participants. The data were analysed using the operative proposal of Minayo. Results Two themes emerged, Health worker and family member coping with a cancer diagnosis and Health worker and family member coping with the proximity of death. Conclusions Being a family member and a health professional at the same time demanded greater involvement in care and caused distress since these workers witnessed the suffering of a family member with a terminal disease. However, their professional knowledge supported decision-making during the care process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#77
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,066
of 316,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.