You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potential Role of Twitter at an Annual Congress in Japan ― Narrative Literature Review of “Tweet the Meeting” ―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Reports, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circrep.cr-19-0046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Atsushi Mizuno, Takuya Kishi, Chisa Matsumoto, Fujimi Kawai, Mari Ishida, Shoji Sanada, Seiji Hokimoto, Yoshihiko Saito, Keiko Yamauchi-Takihara, Issei Komuro, Koichi Node |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 50 | 48% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 91 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 10% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#626,062
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Reports
#2
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,223
of 356,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Reports
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.