↓ Skip to main content

Chinese herbal medicine suxiao jiuxin wan for angina pectoris

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese herbal medicine suxiao jiuxin wan for angina pectoris
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004473.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Duan, Likun Zhou, Taixiang Wu, Guan J Liu, Jieqi Qiao, Jiafu Wei, Juan Ni, Jie Zheng, Xiao Y Chen, Qin Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Psychology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,816,609
of 14,056,542 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,146
of 10,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,908
of 261,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,056,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.