↓ Skip to main content

Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob C. Jentzer, Sean van Diepen, Gregory W. Barsness, Timothy D. Henry, Venu Menon, Charanjit S. Rihal, Srihari S. Naidu, David A. Baran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 272 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Postgraduate 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Professor 7 6%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 42 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#99,872
of 17,041,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#245
of 13,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,651
of 273,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#10
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,041,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.