↓ Skip to main content

Polar policy making: Two ethnographic accounts of Polar field scientists interacting with Polar governance and policy

Overview of attention for article published in International Sociology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polar policy making: Two ethnographic accounts of Polar field scientists interacting with Polar governance and policy
Published in
International Sociology, September 2019
DOI 10.1177/0268580919870455
Authors

Laura Ferguson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2019.
All research outputs
#9,127,453
of 14,537,063 outputs
Outputs from International Sociology
#235
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,604
of 263,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Sociology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,537,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.