↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for increasing the participation of women in community breast cancer screening

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies for increasing the participation of women in community breast cancer screening
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002943
Authors

Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Mercè Marzo Castillejo, Manel Pladevall Vila, Joan Marti, José I Emparanza

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 34 26%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 23 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,027,482
of 13,644,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,552
of 10,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,010
of 121,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.