↓ Skip to main content

Variable impacts of contemporary versus legacy agricultural phosphorus on US river water quality

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variable impacts of contemporary versus legacy agricultural phosphorus on US river water quality
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1903226116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah M. Stackpoole, Edward G. Stets, Lori A. Sprague

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 32%
Student > Master 14 22%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Engineering 4 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#889,821
of 15,482,068 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14,338
of 85,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,749
of 268,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#366
of 918 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,482,068 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 918 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.