You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Variable impacts of contemporary versus legacy agricultural phosphorus on US river water quality
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1903226116 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah M. Stackpoole, Edward G. Stets, Lori A. Sprague |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 30% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
Scientists | 9 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 21% |
Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
Professor | 7 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 4% |
Other | 26 | 16% |
Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 50 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 15% |
Engineering | 12 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Unknown | 57 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,979,997
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#24,434
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,669
of 358,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#419
of 925 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 925 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.