↓ Skip to main content

Method to the Madness: Tracking and Interviewing Respondents in a Longitudinal Study of Prisoner Reentry

Overview of attention for article published in Sociological Methods & Research, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Method to the Madness: Tracking and Interviewing Respondents in a Longitudinal Study of Prisoner Reentry
Published in
Sociological Methods & Research, September 2019
DOI 10.1177/0049124119875962
Authors

Chantal Fahmy, Kendra J. Clark, Meghan M. Mitchell, Scott H. Decker, David C. Pyrooz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 78%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#922,591
of 17,175,498 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Methods & Research
#27
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,374
of 274,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Methods & Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,175,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them