↓ Skip to main content

What If Planet 9 Is a Primordial Black Hole?

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 40,335)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
What If Planet 9 Is a Primordial Black Hole?
Published in
Physical Review Letters, July 2020
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.125.051103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakub Scholtz, James Unwin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,415 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 62 55%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2476. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,147
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#2
of 40,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194
of 428,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#1
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.