You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of dietary inulin, statin, and their co-treatment on hyperlipidemia, hepatic steatosis and changes in drug-metabolizing enzymes in rats fed a high-fat and high-sucrose diet
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1743-7075-9-23 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Junko Sugatani, Satoshi Sadamitsu, Tadashi Wada, Yasuhiro Yamazaki, Akira Ikari, Masao Miwa |
Abstract |
Rats fed a high-fat and high-sucrose (HF) diet develop hepatic steatosis and hyperlipidemia. There are several reports that a change in nutritional status affects hepatic levels of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Synthetic inulin is a dietary component that completely evades glucide digestion. Supplementing a HF diet with inulin ameliorates hypertriglycemia and hepatic steatosis, but not hypercholesterolemia. This study aimed at distinguishing the effects of synthetic inulin and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin), which inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#916
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,749
of 172,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.