You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Endocannabinoids and the Endocrine System in Health and Disease.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
Endocannabinoids
|
| Published in |
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-20825-1_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-920824-4, 978-3-31-920825-1, 978-3-31-920824-4, 978-3-31-920825-1
|
| Authors |
Hillard, Cecilia J, Cecilia J. Hillard, Hillard, Cecilia J. |
| Editors |
Roger G. Pertwee |
| Abstract |
Some of the earliest reports of the effects of cannabis consumption on humans were related to endocrine system changes. In this review, the effects of cannabinoids and the role of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in the regulation of the following endocrine systems are discussed: the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, prolactin and oxytocin, thyroid hormone and growth hormone, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Preclinical and human study results are presented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,091,199
of 24,995,611 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#36
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,491
of 364,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#7
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.