↓ Skip to main content

Histamine H2‐receptor antagonists for urticaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histamine H2‐receptor antagonists for urticaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008596.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zbys Fedorowicz, Esther J van Zuuren, Nianfang Hu

Abstract

Urticaria is a common skin disease characterised by itching weals or hives, which can occur almost anywhere on the body. There are a number of different subtypes and a range of available treatment options. There is lack of agreement on the efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists used in the treatment of urticaria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 181 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 13 7%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 58 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Psychology 10 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 64 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,208,044
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,524
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,062
of 169,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.