↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with the prescription of vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with the prescription of vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse
Published in
Clinics, September 2019
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2019/e934
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suelene Albuquerque Coelho, Luiz Gustavo O Brito, Camila Carvalho de Araújo, Luiza Borges Aguiar, Jorge M Haddad, Paulo C Giraldo, Cássia R T Juliato

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Unspecified 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#667
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,570
of 351,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.