↓ Skip to main content

Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
110 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
445 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1907207116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma E. Garnett, Andrew Balmford, Chris Sandbrook, Mark A. Pilling, Theresa M. Marteau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 445 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Professor 5 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 16%
Environmental Science 19 14%
Psychology 10 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 41 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,714
of 16,086,446 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#166
of 86,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147
of 271,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8
of 918 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,086,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 918 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.