↓ Skip to main content

Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1912488116
Pubmed ID
Authors

David F. Feldon, Kaylee Litson, Soojeong Jeong, Jennifer M. Blaney, Jina Kang, Candace Miller, Kimberly Griffin, Josipa Roksa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,131 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 286 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 27%
Researcher 61 21%
Student > Master 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 38 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 10%
Psychology 24 8%
Chemistry 24 8%
Environmental Science 16 6%
Other 62 22%
Unknown 71 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,782
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#289
of 98,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183
of 347,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6
of 919 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 919 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.