| Title |
Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Internal Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.7326/m19-1621 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradley C. Johnston, Dena Zeraatkar, Mi Ah Han, Robin W.M. Vernooij, Claudia Valli, Regina El Dib, Catherine Marshall, Patrick J. Stover, Susan Fairweather-Taitt, Grzegorz Wójcik, Faiz Bhatia, Russell de Souza, Carlos Brotons, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Chirag J. Patel, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Malgorzata M. Bala, Gordon H. Guyatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,397 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 390 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 174 | 7% |
| Canada | 92 | 4% |
| Spain | 75 | 3% |
| Australia | 58 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 58 | 2% |
| France | 44 | 2% |
| Argentina | 26 | 1% |
| South Africa | 24 | 1% |
| Other | 333 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1123 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1991 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 205 | 9% |
| Scientists | 152 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 34 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 500 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 70 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 13% |
| Other | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 8% |
| Other | 93 | 19% |
| Unknown | 120 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 81 | 16% |
| Unknown | 146 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4717. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#880
of 24,930,865 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#7
of 13,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 356,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#1
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,930,865 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.