You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to improve healthcare improvement—an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.l5514 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Dixon-Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 975 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 365 | 37% |
| United States | 72 | 7% |
| Australia | 47 | 5% |
| Ireland | 34 | 3% |
| Canada | 25 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Colombia | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 59 | 6% |
| Unknown | 350 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 532 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 260 | 27% |
| Scientists | 160 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 21% |
| Unknown | 65 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 69 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 685. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#31,176
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#668
of 64,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#623
of 363,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#13
of 812 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 812 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.