↓ Skip to main content

How to improve healthcare improvement—an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1023 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to improve healthcare improvement—an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods
Published in
British Medical Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l5514
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Dixon-Woods

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,023 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Other 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 21 28%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 724. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#12,654
of 16,298,581 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#340
of 50,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373
of 272,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#13
of 784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,298,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.