↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Review of Case Reports on the Adverse Events Due to Health Food Intake by Cancer Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Yakugaku Zasshi = Journal of Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Review of Case Reports on the Adverse Events Due to Health Food Intake by Cancer Patients
Published in
Yakugaku Zasshi = Journal of Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, October 2019
DOI 10.1248/yakushi.19-00116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayako Kojima, Yoko Sato, Chiharu Nishijima, Keizo Umegaki, Tsuyoshi Chiba

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,031,558
of 14,331,316 outputs
Outputs from Yakugaku Zasshi = Journal of Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
#235
of 1,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,986
of 263,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Yakugaku Zasshi = Journal of Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,331,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,490 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.