↓ Skip to main content

Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007565.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Elattar, Andrew Bryant, Brett A Winter-Roach, Mohamed Hatem, Raj Naik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 145 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 20 13%
Other 13 9%
Other 49 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 74%
Unspecified 16 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 9 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,148,240
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,444
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,780
of 220,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.