↓ Skip to main content

Sex-Based Disparities in the Hourly Earnings of Surgeons in the Fee-for-Service System in Ontario, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Surgery, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 2,766)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
607 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Sex-Based Disparities in the Hourly Earnings of Surgeons in the Fee-for-Service System in Ontario, Canada
Published in
JAMA Surgery, December 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3769
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fahima Dossa, Andrea N. Simpson, Rinku Sutradhar, David R. Urbach, George Tomlinson, Allan S. Detsky, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 607 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 606. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#19,459
of 17,489,166 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#22
of 2,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#523
of 277,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#2
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,489,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.