You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Theories of Change in Rural Policy Evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sociologia Ruralis, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/soru.12269 |
| Authors |
Damian Maye, Gareth Enticott, Rhiannon Naylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 48% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,260,664
of 25,104,329 outputs
Outputs from Sociologia Ruralis
#40
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,671
of 357,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociologia Ruralis
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,104,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.