↓ Skip to main content

Blood and robots: How remotely piloted vehicles and related technologies affect the politics of violence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strategic Studies, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 441)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters
Title
Blood and robots: How remotely piloted vehicles and related technologies affect the politics of violence
Published in
Journal of Strategic Studies, October 2019
DOI 10.1080/01402390.2019.1643329
Authors

Erik Gartzke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#643,110
of 13,617,861 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strategic Studies
#47
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,666
of 158,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strategic Studies
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.