You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Riverine macrophytes control seasonal nutrient uptake via both physical and biological pathways
Freshwater Biology, October 2019
Tenna Riis, Jennifer L. Tank, Alexander J. Reisinger, Antoine Aubenau, Kevin R. Roche, Peter S. Levi, Annette Baattrup‐Pedersen, Anette B. Alnoee, Diogo Bolster
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||9||60%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||13%|
|Student > Master||9||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||8||12%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||4||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||15||22%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||3||4%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
of 2,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 350,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.