↓ Skip to main content

Hokkaidō 150: settler colonialism and Indigeneity in modern Japan and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Asian Studies, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 307)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hokkaidō 150: settler colonialism and Indigeneity in modern Japan and beyond
Published in
Critical Asian Studies, October 2019
DOI 10.1080/14672715.2019.1665291
Authors

Tristan R. Grunow, Fuyubi Nakamura, Katsuya Hirano, Mai Ishihara, ann-elise lewallen, Sheryl Lightfoot, Mayunkiki, Danika Medak-Saltzman, Terri-Lynn Williams-Davidson, Tomoe Yahata

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 40%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Linguistics 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,231,567
of 21,799,263 outputs
Outputs from Critical Asian Studies
#18
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,926
of 293,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Asian Studies
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,799,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them