| Title |
Cows painted with zebra-like striping can avoid biting fly attack
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0223447 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomoki Kojima, Kazato Oishi, Yasushi Matsubara, Yuki Uchiyama, Yoshihiko Fukushima, Naoto Aoki, Say Sato, Tatsuaki Masuda, Junichi Ueda, Hiroyuki Hirooka, Katsutoshi Kino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7,645 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 922 | 12% |
| Japan | 313 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 286 | 4% |
| France | 248 | 3% |
| Canada | 207 | 3% |
| India | 154 | 2% |
| Brazil | 111 | 1% |
| Spain | 87 | 1% |
| Germany | 74 | <1% |
| Other | 1132 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4111 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6972 | 91% |
| Scientists | 433 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 151 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 81 | 1% |
| Unknown | 8 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3887. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,322
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11
of 224,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16
of 364,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1
of 2,544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.