↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in the diagnosis of paediatric pneumonia in intervention field trials: recommendations from a pneumonia field trial working group

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges in the diagnosis of paediatric pneumonia in intervention field trials: recommendations from a pneumonia field trial working group
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30249-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dina Goodman, Mary E Crocker, Farhan Pervaiz, Eric D McCollum, Kyle Steenland, Suzanne M Simkovich, Catherine H Miele, Laura L Hammitt, Phabiola Herrera, Heather J Zar, Harry Campbell, Claudio F Lanata, John P McCracken, Lisa M Thompson, Ghislaine Rosa, Miles A Kirby, Sarada Garg, Gurusamy Thangavel, Vijayalakshmi Thanasekaraan, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Carina King, Thomas Clasen, William Checkley, HAPIN Investigators, Abidan Nambajimana, Ajay Pillarisetti, Amit Verma, Amy Lovvorn, Anaité Diaz, Aris Papageorghiou, Ashley Toenjes, Ashlinn Quinn, Azhar Nizam, Barry Ryan, Bonnie Young, Dana Barr, Dina Goodman, Eduardo Canuz, Elisa Puzzolo, Eric McCollum, Erick Mollinedo, Fiona Majorin, Florien Ndagijimana, Ghislaine Rosa, Gurusamy Thangavel, Howard Chang, Irma Fuentes, J Jaime Miranda, JD Ntivuguruzwa, Jean Uwizeyimana, Jennifer Peel, Jeremy Sarnat, Jiawen Liao, John McCracken, Joshua Rosenthal, Juan Espinoza, JM Campbell, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Kendra Williams, Kirk Smith, Krishnendu Mukhopadhyay, Kyle Steenland, Lance Waller, Lawrence Moulton, Lindsay Jaacks, Lindsay Underhill, Lisa de la Fuentes, Lisa Elon, Lisa Thompson, Luke Naeher, Maggie Clark, Margaret Laws, Marilú Chiang, Marjorie Howard, Mary Crocker, Michael Johnson, Miles Kirby, Naveen Puttaswamy, Oscar De Leon, Phabiola Herrera, Rachel Craik, Rachel Merrick, Ricardo Piedrahita, Sankar Sambandam, Sarada Garg, Sarah Rajkumar, Savannah Gupton, Shakir Hossen, Sheela Sinharoy, Shirin Jabbarzadeh, Stella Hartinger, Steven Harvey, Suzanne Simkovich, Thomas Clasen, Usha Ramakrishnan, Vanessa Burrowes, Victor Davila-Roman, Vigneswari Aravindalochanan, William Checkley, Yunyun Chen, Zoe Sakas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 75 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 85 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,448,129
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#1,224
of 2,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,759
of 363,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#40
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.