↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012552.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan VA Franco, Tarek Turk, Jae Hung Jung, Yu-Tian Xiao, Stanislav Iakhno, Federico Ignacio Tirapegui, Virginia Garrote, Valeria Vietto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Unknown 14 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#747,519
of 14,308,102 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,259
of 10,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,632
of 263,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,308,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.