You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zika virus NS1 structure reveals diversity of electrostatic surfaces among flaviviruses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nsmb.3213 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hao Song, Jianxun Qi, Joel Haywood, Yi Shi, George F Gao |
| Abstract |
The association of Zika virus (ZIKV) infections with microcephaly has resulted in an ongoing public-health emergency. Here we report the crystal structure of a C-terminal fragment of ZIKV nonstructural protein 1 (NS1), a major host-interaction molecule that functions in flaviviral replication, pathogenesis and immune evasion. Comparison with West Nile and dengue virus NS1 structures reveals conserved features but diverse electrostatic characteristics at host-interaction interfaces, thus possibly implying different modes of flavivirus pathogenesis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
| Scientists | 12 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 365 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 73 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 41 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#676,732
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#225
of 4,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,062
of 313,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.