You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Moderate versus extreme hypofractionated radiotherapy: a toxicity comparative analysis in low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00432-019-02983-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luca Nicosia, Rosario Mazzola, Michele Rigo, Vanessa Figlia, Niccolò Giaj-Levra, Giuseppe Napoli, Francesco Ricchetti, Stefanie Corradini, Ruggero Ruggieri, Filippo Alongi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
Italy | 1 | 20% |
Mexico | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,065,859
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#1,277
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,719
of 347,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.