↓ Skip to main content

Decoding human fetal liver haematopoiesis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
420 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
416 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
636 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decoding human fetal liver haematopoiesis
Published in
Nature, October 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1652-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorin-Mirel Popescu, Rachel A. Botting, Emily Stephenson, Kile Green, Simone Webb, Laura Jardine, Emily F. Calderbank, Krzysztof Polanski, Issac Goh, Mirjana Efremova, Meghan Acres, Daniel Maunder, Peter Vegh, Yorick Gitton, Jong-Eun Park, Roser Vento-Tormo, Zhichao Miao, David Dixon, Rachel Rowell, David McDonald, James Fletcher, Elizabeth Poyner, Gary Reynolds, Michael Mather, Corina Moldovan, Lira Mamanova, Frankie Greig, Matthew D. Young, Kerstin B. Meyer, Steven Lisgo, Jaume Bacardit, Andrew Fuller, Ben Millar, Barbara Innes, Susan Lindsay, Michael J. T. Stubbington, Monika S. Kowalczyk, Bo Li, Orr Ashenberg, Marcin Tabaka, Danielle Dionne, Timothy L. Tickle, Michal Slyper, Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen, Andrew Filby, Peter Carey, Alexandra-Chloé Villani, Anindita Roy, Aviv Regev, Alain Chédotal, Irene Roberts, Berthold Göttgens, Sam Behjati, Elisa Laurenti, Sarah A. Teichmann, Muzlifah Haniffa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 420 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 636 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 636 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 19%
Researcher 115 18%
Student > Master 50 8%
Student > Bachelor 48 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 5%
Other 88 14%
Unknown 178 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 160 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 85 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 9%
Computer Science 13 2%
Other 50 8%
Unknown 199 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 326. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#105,304
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,175
of 98,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,077
of 368,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#198
of 1,042 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,042 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.