↓ Skip to main content

Inhaled antibiotics for long-term therapy in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhaled antibiotics for long-term therapy in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001021.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Ryan, Meenu Singh, Kerry Dwan

Abstract

Inhaled antibiotics are commonly used to treat persistent airway infection that contributes to lung damage in people with cystic fibrosis (CF).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 127 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Other 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 19 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,026,248
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,439
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,216
of 109,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.