↓ Skip to main content

Homicídios no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: uma análise da violência letal

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Homicídios no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: uma análise da violência letal
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015214.14712015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisca Letícia Miranda Gadelha Cardoso, Fátima Regina Cecchetto, Juliana Silva Corrêa, Tiago Oliveira de Souza

Abstract

The evolution of rates were analyzed for the following categories: murder, larceny, bodily harm followed by death, homicide for resistance to police resulting in death, policeman killed, missing persons and dead bodies found in the state and city of Rio de Janeiro and in Integrated Public Security Area 16 (AISP 16). An ecological study was conducted for the period from 2002 to 2013, using data from the Public Security Institute. To analyze the time trend and evolution of murder charges, resistance to police resulting in death and missing persons rates, Joinpoint regression was performed, using these rates as the dependent variables and the calendar year as the independent variable. For the other categories only the time trends of the rates were analyzed for the relative change in rates at the beginning and end of the period. There were falls in rates in all categories, except for missing persons. The murder rate showed a significant downward trend in the three locations. The results contributed to definition of the pattern of violence in the three locations based on the dialogue between the social sciences, public health and safety that made it possible to establish subjective and objective aspects linked to the study findings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 29%
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,633,613
of 13,816,277 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#180
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,240
of 262,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,816,277 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.