↓ Skip to main content

Improving Darwin Core for research and management of alien species

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 268)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Darwin Core for research and management of alien species
Published in
Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, October 2019
DOI 10.3897/biss.3.38084
Authors

Quentin Groom, Peter Desmet, Lien Reyserhove, Tim Adriaens, Damiano Oldoni, Sonia Vanderhoeven, Steven J Baskauf, Arthur Chapman, Melodie McGeoch, Ramona Walls, John Wieczorek, John Wilson, Paula F Zermoglio, Annie Simpson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 75%
Environmental Science 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,018,935
of 14,009,177 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity Information Science and Standards
#4
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,434
of 261,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity Information Science and Standards
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,009,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them