You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Starting Where the Client Is: Harm Reduction Guidelines for Clinical Social Work Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Social Work Journal, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10615-016-0584-3 |
| Authors |
Sheila P. Vakharia, Jeannie Little |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 46% |
| Canada | 6 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Armenia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 74% |
| Scientists | 15 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 33 | 27% |
| Psychology | 22 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#519,729
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Social Work Journal
#6
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,005
of 298,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Social Work Journal
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them