↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
64 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007429.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel JS Tamaoki, Mário Lenza, Fabio T Matsunaga, João Carlos Belloti, Marcelo H Matsumoto, Flávio Faloppa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 31 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#543,134
of 16,286,366 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,367
of 11,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,655
of 274,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,286,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.