↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007429.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel JS Tamaoki, Mário Lenza, Fabio T Matsunaga, João Carlos Belloti, Marcelo H Matsumoto, Flávio Faloppa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 27%
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Other 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#492,137
of 14,367,182 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,416
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,211
of 265,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,367,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.