↓ Skip to main content

Assisted standing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assisted standing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011550.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katy Pedlow, Suzanne McDonough, Sheila Lennon, Claire Kerr, Ian Bradbury

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Psychology 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 26 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,705,271
of 16,103,624 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,402
of 11,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,914
of 274,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,103,624 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.