↓ Skip to main content

Equidad según sexo y de género en la investigación: justificación de las guías SAGER y recomendaciones para su uso

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Equidad según sexo y de género en la investigación: justificación de las guías SAGER y recomendaciones para su uso
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.04.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shirin Heidari, Thomas F. Babor, Paola De Castro, Sera Tort, Mirjam Curno

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Master 13 11%
Other 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Psychology 12 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 40 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,312,228
of 18,917,096 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#288
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,259
of 284,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,917,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.