| Title |
Defining dangerous anthropogenic interference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0901303106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael E. Mann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 33% |
| Canada | 6 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 81% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Professor | 13 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 27 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#312,802
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,668
of 103,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#718
of 117,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#25
of 764 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 764 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.