↓ Skip to main content

Defining dangerous anthropogenic interference

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
63 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Defining dangerous anthropogenic interference
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0901303106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael E. Mann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Australia 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 119 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 20%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 23 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#314,358
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,680
of 103,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#724
of 117,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#25
of 764 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 764 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.