The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Plant and insect herbivore community variation across the Paleocene–Eocene boundary in the Hanna Basin, southeastern Wyoming
|
---|---|
Published in |
PeerJ, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.7717/peerj.7798 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lauren E. Azevedo Schmidt, Regan E. Dunn, Jason Mercer, Marieke Dechesne, Ellen D. Currano |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 58% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 22% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,433,744
of 26,737,020 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#3,391
of 14,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,871
of 372,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#101
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,737,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.