You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant and insect herbivore community variation across the Paleocene–Eocene boundary in the Hanna Basin, southeastern Wyoming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PeerJ, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.7798 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren E. Azevedo Schmidt, Regan E. Dunn, Jason Mercer, Marieke Dechesne, Ellen D. Currano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 48% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,140,547
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#2,201
of 15,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,641
of 369,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#67
of 479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.