↓ Skip to main content

1200 years of Upper Missouri River streamflow reconstructed from tree rings

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1200 years of Upper Missouri River streamflow reconstructed from tree rings
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105971
Authors

Justin T. Martin, Gregory T. Pederson, Connie A. Woodhouse, Edward R. Cook, Gregory J. McCabe, Erika K. Wise, Patrick Erger, Larry Dolan, Marketa McGuire, Subhrendu Gangopadhyay, Katherine Chase, Jeremy S. Littell, Stephen T. Gray, Scott St. George, Jonathan Friedman, Dave Sauchyn, Jeannine St. Jacques, John King

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 56%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#940,818
of 13,935,840 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#267
of 2,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,428
of 253,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#19
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,935,840 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.