Title |
Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Preexisting Malignancies in Remission
|
---|---|
Published in |
Transplantation, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1097/tp.0000000000001192 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sergio A. Acuna, Johnny W. Huang, Corinne Daly, Prakesh S. Shah, S. Joseph Kim, Nancy N. Baxter |
Abstract |
Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) with a pretransplant malignancy (PTM) are at increased risk for cancer recurrence. However, it is unclear whether differences in survival and incidence of posttransplant de novo malignancies exist between recipients with PTM and those without PTM. We designed a systematic review to synthesize all available evidence assessing these outcomes. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to identify studies comparing the following outcomes in SOTR by PTM status: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) cancer-specific mortality, and (3) incidence of posttransplant de novo malignancy. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Thirty-two cohort studies were included. Recipients with PTM were at increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to recipients without PTM (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.81). Similarly, recipients with PTM were 3 times more likely to die of cancer (pooled HR, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.29-4.27). The pooled HR for developing posttransplant de novo malignancy was also increased (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.52-2.42). The association of all-cause mortality and SOTR with PTM did not vary by transplanted organ. Pretransplant malignancy is associated with increased risk of all cause-mortality, cancer-specific mortality and of developing de novo malignancies after transplantation compared with those without PTM. These results reaffirm the need for careful selection of transplant recipients with PTM. Tailored screening and management strategies should be developed for this group of patients. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
United States | 3 | 17% |
Canada | 3 | 17% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Turkey | 1 | 6% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
Mexico | 1 | 6% |
Ireland | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 33% |
Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 22% |
Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 56% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 25% |