↓ Skip to main content

Broad consent for biobanks is best – provided it is also deep

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Broad consent for biobanks is best – provided it is also deep
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0414-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rasmus Bjerregaard Mikkelsen, Mickey Gjerris, Gunhild Waldemar, Peter Sandøe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 12 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,059,340
of 16,650,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#95
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,304
of 276,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,650,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them