You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natriuretic peptide‐guided treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients without heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013015.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Sweeney, Fiona Ryan, Mark Ledwidge, Cristin Ryan, Ken McDonald, Chris Watson, Rebabonye B Pharithi, Joe Gallagher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 88 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 99 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,621,228
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,704
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,503
of 369,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.