You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Sandia Fracture Challenge: blind round robin predictions of ductile tearing
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Fracture, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10704-013-9904-6 |
Authors |
B. L. Boyce, S. L. B. Kramer, H. E. Fang, T. E. Cordova, M. K. Neilsen, K. Dion, A. K. Kaczmarowski, E. Karasz, L. Xue, A. J. Gross, A. Ghahremaninezhad, K. Ravi-Chandar, S.-P. Lin, S.-W. Chi, J. S. Chen, E. Yreux, M. Rüter, D. Qian, Z. Zhou, S. Bhamare, D. T. O’Connor, S. Tang, K. I. Elkhodary, J. Zhao, J. D. Hochhalter, A. R. Cerrone, A. R. Ingraffea, P. A. Wawrzynek, B. J. Carter, J. M. Emery, M. G. Veilleux, P. Yang, Y. Gan, X. Zhang, Z. Chen, E. Madenci, B. Kilic, T. Zhang, E. Fang, P. Liu, J. Lua, K. Nahshon, M. Miraglia, J. Cruce, R. DeFrese, E. T. Moyer, S. Brinckmann, L. Quinkert, K. Pack, M. Luo, T. Wierzbicki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 190 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 31% |
Researcher | 40 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 9% |
Professor | 16 | 8% |
Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 12% |
Unknown | 25 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 118 | 61% |
Materials Science | 28 | 14% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,257,499
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Fracture
#9
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,003
of 307,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Fracture
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them