You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aay7976 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph W Veldman, Julie C Aleman, Swanni T Alvarado, T Michael Anderson, Sally Archibald, William J Bond, Thomas W Boutton, Nina Buchmann, Elise Buisson, Josep G Canadell, Michele de Sá Dechoum, Milton H Diaz-Toribio, Giselda Durigan, John J Ewel, G Wilson Fernandes, Alessandra Fidelis, Forrest Fleischman, Stephen P Good, Daniel M Griffith, Julia-Maria Hermann, William A Hoffmann, Soizig Le Stradic, Caroline E R Lehmann, Gregory Mahy, Ashish N Nerlekar, Jesse B Nippert, Reed F Noss, Colin P Osborne, Gerhard E Overbeck, Catherine L Parr, Juli G Pausas, R Toby Pennington, Michael P Perring, Francis E Putz, Jayashree Ratnam, Mahesh Sankaran, Isabel B Schmidt, Christine B Schmitt, Fernando A O Silveira, A Carla Staver, Nicola Stevens, Christopher J Still, Caroline A E Strömberg, Vicky M Temperton, J Morgan Varner, Nicholas P Zaloumis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 494 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 66 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 6% |
| Spain | 28 | 6% |
| France | 18 | 4% |
| Germany | 16 | 3% |
| Brazil | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 15 | 3% |
| India | 15 | 3% |
| South Africa | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 78 | 16% |
| Unknown | 199 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 320 | 65% |
| Scientists | 149 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 276 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 71 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 81 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 95 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 875. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,759
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Science
#984
of 83,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#406
of 372,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#21
of 923 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 923 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.