↓ Skip to main content

‘Sticky’ foods: How school practices produce negative emotions for mothers and children

Overview of attention for article published in Emotion, Space and Society, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 210)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Sticky’ foods: How school practices produce negative emotions for mothers and children
Published in
Emotion, Space and Society, November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100626
Authors

Claire Tanner, JaneMaree Maher, Deana Leahy, Jo Lindsay, Sian Supski, Jan Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#920,757
of 13,722,278 outputs
Outputs from Emotion, Space and Society
#18
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,435
of 194,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emotion, Space and Society
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,722,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.