You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Forming and implementing community advisory boards in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0409-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Zhao, Thomas Fitzpatrick, Bin Wan, Suzanne Day, Allison Mathews, Joseph D. Tucker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,515,944
of 24,753,534 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#759
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,557
of 361,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,753,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.