↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient-enriched formula versus standard term formula for preterm infants following hospital discharge

Overview of attention for article published in this source, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutrient-enriched formula versus standard term formula for preterm infants following hospital discharge
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004696.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Young, Lauren, Morgan, Jessie, McCormick, Felicia M, McGuire, William

Abstract

Preterm infants are often growth-restricted at hospital discharge. Feeding infants after hospital discharge with nutrient-enriched formula rather than standard term formula might facilitate "catch-up" growth and improve development.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
South Africa 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
France 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 65 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 7 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#299,733
of 4,507,280 outputs
Outputs from this source
#1,509
of 7,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,115
of 76,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#17
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.