You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Future of sepsis therapies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1274-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom van der Poll |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,405,243
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,230
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,417
of 313,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#43
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.