↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review and meta-analysis of tick-borne disease risk factors in residential yards, neighborhoods, and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review and meta-analysis of tick-borne disease risk factors in residential yards, neighborhoods, and beyond
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-4484-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilya R. Fischhoff, Sarah E. Bowden, Felicia Keesing, Richard S. Ostfeld

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 27%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,606,061
of 16,084,632 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,402
of 5,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,735
of 329,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#162
of 653 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,084,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 653 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.